So I expected massive ridiculosity. But there really wasn't. I mean, the dude's ranty, abrasive and probably more than a little narcissistic [but wouldn't you have to be, to achieve any degree of success in entertainment?] but he's not wrong.
He's fundamentally talking about living his life on his own terms, unapologetically and saying "screw you" to anybody who doesn't like it. Good on him. And the "craziest" bits making the rounds in the media are pulled out of context or are clearly in-jokes between him and Alex.
That's part 1/3, here's the subsequent two portions of the interview.
And here's another thing, on a lot of the stuff pointed to by the tsk-tsk'ing nannies as clear signs of his addictions and denial - again - the thing is - he's not wrong. At all. The efficiacy of AA is highly debatable. The very best #'s by their own organization shows success rates only in the mid 20% ranges - and those are really not all that solid, as far as stats go. As an organization it is, basically, very religious and cult like. And its founder was a fan and proponent of LSD as well as ouija boards and smoking while needing an air tank.
And personally, genetic predispositions and/or learned behaviors be damned, the disease model of alcoholism strikes me as a farcical cop-out for chosen behaviors.
And my opinions on that are the results of a tangled web of personal experience. I've had a family member who's achieved 25+ years of sobriety via - initially - rehab, AA & 12 step style programs. At the same time, their divergence from the accepted modality of treatment and retreat from the culture, at an early stage of sobriety, hasn't affected their success one bit. There are far too many who make that particular modality their new god and their new addiction. And you know what? If that works for them and gets them to lead a better life according to what they want and they need - good for them. But don't mistake that for some kind of TRUTH that needs to be applied to others.
And, personally, I don't think Bill W.'s endorsement of LSD is wrong... because I think LSD, like most other entheogens/hallucinogens, can be extremely valuable learning tools. But find his inability to reconcile the obviously hypocritical viewpoint on one mind altering/clarifying substance with another as incredibly obtuse and frustrating. And the current orgs blatant denial and attempted whitewashing of both the religious and drugs history of AA doubly frustrating. Not to mention modern AA would never even consider the fact that, you know what, maybe LSD would be helpful in kicking other addictions or psychological problems. [See here for the use of MDMA/ecstasy in treating PTSD and ibogaine in the use of opiate addiction.]
We're such a puritanical, fear based, pleasure averse, judgmental culture, sometimes...
But when you do take it out of context, and add cats, well... that does equal brilliance. And what the internets does best, clearly - Cats Quote Charlie Sheen « Medium Large [more at the link.]
I am a 45 year old man that abused alcohol for years and told myself to never drink again, I haven't touched a drop in more than 5 years and I did it with my brain! I decided it was time to either get a handle on what controlled me or it would eventually consume me. No AA needed here. Perhaps there are those that need AA just as there are those of "us" that don't need AA. I support Charlie Sheen 100% I am a huge fan of "Men"
ReplyDelete