"Lots of countries seek 'weapons of mass destruction.' When do we plan to disarm Israel and Russia? Of course dictatorships are repressive. When do we plan to liberate the people of Zimbabwe, Burma, Red China, and Uzbekistan?
Iraq may have been targeted for geo-strategic reasons – regardless of its blamelessness in Sept. 11 – as a central 'breadbasket' of the Middle East. But that’s not the case Mr. Bush has tried to build.
Why did chaos descend after our invasion? Because the Washington neoconservative desk jockeys who dreamed the thing up had no military experience, blissfully ignored the British experience of 1918–1921, wishfully assumed the various Iraqi ethnic groups whose feuds had long been suppressed by the Baathists would welcome us with flowers and then promptly start holding orderly town meetings, and that we therefore wouldn’t need much of an occupation force.
...The dedication and courage of our fighting men stands unchallenged. But the fact that staff sergeants will do their duty, regardless, cannot be taken as evidence that a war is wise or just. Quite the contrary. Asked to prove the sergeant’s sacrifice was justified, the president can hardly be allowed to use the sergeant’s unquestioning willingness to ACCEPT the president’s assurance that his war was just, as EVIDENCE that his war was just."
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
Rewriting History With George W. Bush by Vin Suprynowicz
Rewriting History With George W. Bush by Vin Suprynowicz:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment